BlogMarch 18, 2026

Working with a remote developer in Thailand — what the process looks like

What distributed collaboration actually looks like when it works well
Sim Kritamook
Most development work today is remote by default. The tools exist, the workflows are established, and the expectation of async collaboration is standard. That said, working across timezones, cultures, and contexts still requires deliberate process. Here is how I approach it and what tends to make it work well. Phuket is UTC+7. That means:
  • Europe (CET): 6-hour difference. Overlap works in the morning for Europe, afternoon for Thailand.
  • Australia (AEST): 3-hour difference. Comfortable overlap.
  • US East Coast: 11-hour difference. Overlap is limited but workable with async communication.
For most projects, a one-hour daily sync window is enough. The rest of the work happens asynchronously through clear documentation and structured updates. Before writing any code, I spend time understanding the actual problem. This means:
  • A discovery call to understand the business context
  • Clarifying what success looks like, not just what features are requested
  • A written scope document that both parties can refer back to
Ambiguity at the start is the most common source of problems later. Getting alignment on scope, expectations, and communication patterns early makes the rest of the project much smoother. I default to asynchronous communication: documented updates, shared task boards, and clear handoffs at each stage. This works better than constant real-time messaging for focused development work. For weekly check-ins or milestone reviews, a short video call is usually more efficient than a long message thread. I try to come prepared with a clear agenda so the time is used well. When something unexpected comes up — a technical blocker, a scope question, a decision that needs input — I surface it early rather than waiting for the next scheduled call. One of the most common complaints about freelance developers is that they disappear after launch, leaving behind code that nobody else can maintain. I treat documentation and handoff as part of the project, not an afterthought. This includes:
  • A summary of technical decisions and why they were made
  • Instructions for deployment and environment setup
  • Notes on anything non-obvious in the codebase
The goal is that whoever touches the code next — whether that is me, your team, or another developer — can get up to speed without starting from scratch. In my experience, the projects that go well have a few things in common:
  • A clear point of contact on the client side
  • Decisions made in writing, not just over calls
  • Realistic timelines with buffer for the unexpected
  • Mutual respect for each other's working hours
It is not complicated, but it does require both sides to be deliberate about it. For what to look for before you even get to this stage, see what to look for when hiring a developer in Phuket, or what I offer directly.
Share this post: